Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

XMP Gametype mod.

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    oh there are a couple of other vids. I've been recording them periodically:



    Comment


      #32
      Originally posted by GreatEmerald View Post
      I haven't put that many hours into it (as by the time I discovered it the scene had already dwindled), but anything that brings a touch of Unreal II to the surface is awesome (and XMP is amazingly strategic to boot).

      Nice to hear that you're interested as well



      "Negative. Enemy in our base!"



      XMP isn't that slow, and there's plenty of action. It just may seem that if servers have few players. And it's tactical so you need to reason out whether you want to grab the enemy artifact, hack things or put deployables, and also where.



      Why wouldn't one keep the generators? They're a core mechanic and have always been.

      As for the tier system... That's already handled by things that are not generators. What you're talking about here is an outpost with a deploy point and with hackable doors. To get to it you first have to hack the door, then the deploy point.

      I'd rather explore the alpha idea of making it a more managed budget system with research and production. Also with the idea of pickups/powerups, they are easily available and can bring interesting dynamics into the game.



      As a stepping stone, perhaps. But not in the long run. Classes like in U2XMP are a good idea. Overall the movement must be like in U2XMP or it won't feel right. The class balance there is pretty good as well (as long as Gunners can't use concussion grenades).

      Note that UT4 will most likely have deployables already (it worked well in UT3), so no need to lock down weapons like that. However, also the weapons there are not balanced well enough.

      U2XMP is nice in that all classes have specialised weapons. One weapon is good against vehicles, one weapon is good at range, one weapon is good at close range (the degree varies).

      Gunners have the Shark which is good against vehicles (primary) and at range (alt), and incendiary grenades + Vulcan that are perfect at close range (which is just what's needed: gunners defend, bases are made so you can't enter them with vehicles, gunners specialise in close quarters combat). And the also have the tricky deployable types and refill capabilities, so they can spend time setting traps in bases. They're slow but have a lot of endurance.

      Techs have EMP grenades that are good against vehicles, the Duster that's OK at range, and the Crowd Pleaser + toxic grenades that are good at close-mid range. The specialisation is mostly on midrange, which is good since they have to traverse open space but hack generators in closed spaces. They hack fast, and generally are in midfield. Movement speed and endurance is average, and they put the most sophisticated and energy-draining deployables.

      Rangers have the Shock Lance that's good against vehicles, the Sniper that's perfect at range, the Pistol that's good at mid-long range, and frag grenades that are good at close range. Specialisation on long range, which means they can pick off targets while going through the open area separating the bases (which is where the most time is spent). Speed is fast so best for artifact running, but low endurance to compensate.

      Neither of the three are useless when out of their element, but they do excel at those particular tasks, and it shows.

      Your suggestions do follow the same general pattern but due to things not being adapted, also have flaws. Your Techs have no good anti-vehicle capability, for instance.


      In general I would opt for simply remaking U2XMP at first. I don't think everyone will ever unanimously agree about any changes. But mods can be made for that once it's done, and then based on whether they work well or not they can be integrated.

      As a roadmap, I'd focus first and foremost on the movement mechanics: sprint and jetpacks. I recall regular UT games having the XMP movement mod as a separate mutator, so the same can be done in UT4. That's also the first thing that will get stabilised in UT4 (already pretty stable, I'd say). Next would be the gametype, based on (V)CTF, first adding deploy points, then generators. Then classes and weapons. And finish off with vehicles.
      I couldn't agree with you more!!

      Comment


        #33
        So, Saiboat, did you manage to start anything yet? Given that I just got a UE4 sub, I might as well start working towards this goal. (And while at it, one needs to be mindful of these: https://forums.unrealtournament.com/...ution-licenses )
        Unreal Tournament 4 eXpanded MultiPlayer (UT4XMP) efforts
        My website, listing all my Unreal series mods and mutators

        Comment


          #34
          Hey Emerald, I stopped working on this because my CPU was too slow to productively code with Visual Studio (IntelliSense etc.) and because the full mod / gametype support is still really limited AFAIK.
          Waiting for further updates for modding support. I tried to make a movement mutator then but couldn't because after each line of code I have to wait like 30 seconds to wait for error checking and the same goes for code completion etc.
          XMP | THREAD

          Comment


            #35
            Aww, too bad. Well, I'll try to make something of my own. Maybe start a WIP thread, too.

            Right now for a start I'm thinking of a Deploy Point. Some of the ideas would be useful as a standalone mod, or even in the base game: being able to look at the area you'll spawn in and/or choose where you spawn is very important. It would potentially even be an alternative to spawn protection.
            Unreal Tournament 4 eXpanded MultiPlayer (UT4XMP) efforts
            My website, listing all my Unreal series mods and mutators

            Comment


              #36
              All right, I got some initial values for XMP movement, would be nice is someone tested and especially suggested formulas and values: https://forums.unrealtournament.com/...I-XMP-movement
              Unreal Tournament 4 eXpanded MultiPlayer (UT4XMP) efforts
              My website, listing all my Unreal series mods and mutators

              Comment


                #37
                And now I have a base for the gametype: https://forums.unrealtournament.com/...CTF-(XMP-like)
                Unreal Tournament 4 eXpanded MultiPlayer (UT4XMP) efforts
                My website, listing all my Unreal series mods and mutators

                Comment


                  #38
                  Originally posted by Aksen View Post
                  Is this the right subforum? I am so excited about today's Open Unreal Tournament announcement, and I wanted to share what I will be working on, in case anyone else is interested.


                  Some friends and I from the old XMP community have been kicking around prototypes for an XMP reboot for years now. Finally, FINALLY, we have a solid path to that goal.

                  For those who haven't played XMP, it was the multiplayer component of Unreal 2. I suppose it can be seen as the impetus for the Onslaught gamemode - they do share a number of similarities (team bases with a core objective, vehicles, large open maps). We plan to streamline and combine many of the extra noise, to make the game more newbie-friendly than XMP while maintaining the tactical challenge. Some possibly unique components would include:

                  Gameplay
                  • 4-flag capture the flag. Both teams start with 2 flags, goal is to have all four captured at once.
                  • Generators (This was in the original game, but we have been discussing ways to cut it. Managing a team energy pool can be a nightmare when you're playing with randoms.)
                  • Deploy points - You capture these throughout the map, and can then choose which one you respawn from.
                  • "Hacking" - this was how you captured deploy points, doors (so they would only open for your team), and generators. We will probably do away with this, and instead allow players to capture areas by standing near them - standard Domination style.
                  • Points system - Players earn points by performing actions. A Kill is 100 pts, capturing a supply depot is 225 pts, and so on. Headshots multiply by 1.5 = 150 pts for a kill. Defending an area is also a 1.5x bonus... getting a headshot while defending will give you 100*1.5*1.5 = 225 pts. These points can be spent on deployable turrets etc.



                  Movement
                  • Sprinting
                  • jumpjets (timed release of vertical thrust - it's not instantaneous)
                  • Zero friction on slopes
                  • Wall jumping



                  Character
                  • XMP had three classes. We have been talking about using two bodytypes (heavy and light), and two or three loadouts. We want to give players choice but not too many choices.
                  • Deployable turrets and supplies - In XMP these abilities would drain your team's energy pool. We are discussing other ideas for how to limit the number of deployables players can put down. One idea we have is purchasing them at kiosks during gameplay, using points they have earned.
                  Man, I love where this game is going with gametypes now!
                  Formerly known as Gmax5 on Epic Games Forums.

                  Franklin Iheanacho
                  [Pronounced: EEH-HON-A-CHO]

                  - Game Artist & Programmer
                  - Unreal Engine Veteran

                  My Team
                  Our Current Game

                  Comment


                    #39
                    My repository is now updated to have both Saiboat's gametype and my previous Multi CTF attempt:
                    https://github.com/GreatEmerald/UT4XMPGameMode

                    One thing I thought about is how to make use of some of the things Epic are doing for use in XMP. Like the Showdown stuff that they showed last stream and such. The minimap thing would of course be useful for ONS, and to some extent XMP as well (radar!), although probably the freelook/jump to other point is more useful for spawning. The DM spawning system is a bit like that, although from what I saw it's also less flexible than it should be (only two options).

                    In Experimental Gametype the original Deploy Point system is used, but I'm wondering if it wouldn't be better to use proper PlayerStarts instead. For one thing, bots are aware of how to use those, and improvements that Epic make would directly benefit the project too. But, of course, they need to be hackable; so I'm wondering if it wouldn't be better to make hackable objects as simply a sort of dispatchers. Door hacking panels already work like that: they are assigned a door, and they change the door's owner. The same should be possible to do with PlayerStarts as well. Which would then also allow doing some fancy things, like having the hack panel mounted on a wall, or in a side room from where players actually spawn, or one that when hacked allows spawning in different parts of the map altogether, or that gives spawn points as well as control of a door at the same time. That would add some interesting tactical depth, I believe.
                    Unreal Tournament 4 eXpanded MultiPlayer (UT4XMP) efforts
                    My website, listing all my Unreal series mods and mutators

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X